Selecting a Tick Control Program
The overall approach to suppressing tick populations should be an integrated one that
employs education on preventive measures, selected habitat alterations, and the use of
acaricides. Recognition and avoidance of likely tick-infested areas, wearing appropriate
clothing, use of repellents, frequent self-examination, and prompt removal of ticks are the best
ways to reduce human-tick encounters and risk of disease transmission. Trimming vegetation,
mowing lawns and weedy areas, removal of leaf litter, eliminating or reducing rodent
harborages and nesting sites, planting of deer-resistant plants, and installation of deer fencing
are examples of successful habitat modification techniques. Personal protection
recommendations should be followed when engaged in habitat modification activities. Where
appropriate, the use of habitat- and/or host-targeted chemical control can be a safe and effective
means of reducing tick populations.
Review of the scientific literature suggests that at
this time, host reduction, biological control, and some
habitat management techniques are either unavailable
or impractical for widespread use. Habitat-targeted
chemical control has been shown to be the most reliable,
efficient, and cost-effective method of reducing tick
populations in limited geographical areas. Because of
potential environmental impacts, applications should
be confined to those areas with significant human activity.
In general, large expanses of tick habitat need not
be treated. Lawns, athletic fields, and similar areas
are poor tick habitats that do not require treatment,
except where they abut woodland edge. Selection of an
appropriate acaricide formulation and application method
requires knowledge of the biology, behavior, and habitat
preference of the target tick species. Acaricides applied
to appropriate habitats at the proper time will provide
excellent control of ticks and eliminate the need for
repeated applications, all resulting in a dramatic reduction
of acaricide use. Some of the host-targeted approaches
show great promise in an integrated tick control program.
They are generally more expensive, may be of limited
value in controlling certain tick species or stages,
require knowledge of host biology and behavior to insure
proper deployment of the product, and have an inherent
delay in their effectiveness. For this reason, clients
should be apprised of this lag time and advised to consider
interim measures, such as the use of barrier acaricide
applications. Since no control program will ever eradicate
the tick population, clients should be urged to continue
the use of preventive measures. Design of any integrated
tick control program should be site-specific and in
complete conformance with labeling requirements.